22nd Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Harrogate, UK, 28 August - 1st September, 2000
Paper ICAS 2000-6.11.2

ACTIVE INLET FLOW CONTROL TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION

J. W. Hamstra (1), D. N. Miller (1), P. P. Truax (1), B. A Anderson, B. J. Wendt
(1) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, USA; (2) NASA Glenn Research Center, USA

Keywords: inlet, flow control, microvane, microjet

This paper presents results from a joint Lockheed Martin/NASA Glenn effort to design and verify an ultra-compact, highly-survivable engine inlet subsonic duct based on the emerging technology of Active Inlet Flow Control (AIFC). In the AIFC concept, microscale actuation (~mm in size) is used in an approach denoted ‘secondary flow control’ to intelligently alter a serpentine duct’s inherent secondary flow characteristics with the goal of simultaneously improving the critical systemlevel performance metrics of total pressure recovery, spatial distortion, and RMS turbulence. In this approach, separation control is a secondary benefit, not a design requirement. The baseline concept for this study was a 4:1 aspect ratio ultra-compact (L/D=2.5) serpentine duct that fully obscured line-of-sight view of the engine face. At relevant flow conditions, this type of duct exhibits excessive pressure loss and distortion because of extreme wall curvature. Two sets of flow control effectors were designed with the intent of establishing high performance levels to the baseline duct. The first set used two arrays of 36 co-rotating microvane vortex generators (VGs); the second set used two arrays of 36 micro air-jet (microjet) VGs, which were designed to produce the same ‘vorticity signature’ as the microvanes. Optimization of the microvane array was accomplished using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology to guide selection of parameters used in multiple Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) flow solutions. A verification test conducted in the NASA Glenn W1B test facility indicated low pressure recovery and high distortion for the baseline duct without flow control. With microvane flow control, at a throat Mach number of 0.60, pressure recovery was increased 5%, and both spatial distortion and turbulence were decreased approximately 50%. Microjet effectors also provided significantly improved performance over the baseline configuration.

view full paper